'Lawyer Lingo?' It reads quite well and is a well organized document. The outcome also will set the precedent and give na idea on how the Courts are going to handle new technology.
I agree that the number of pages alone should not disqualify it. If somebody would post the "ultimate Erlang reference in 100 pages", it would probably be upvoted, too. But please at least give me a reason to start reading it. Should I really read through 22 pages to figure out if it is even relevant to me?
you obviously do not need to read all the 22 pages... it is well organized and you can navigate the document very clearly. I looked for about a minute and was able to figure everything I needed. It's actually quite interesting and informative...in the time it has taken you to write all of these replies you definitely could have gotten some idea what this 'lawyer lingo' really was.
