Having read the article, it is clear that it is not baseless speculation.
Two benchmarks running the same code, but with a different name. One runs faster than the other. The one that runs faster has it's name hardcoded in the samsung binaries.
You are right that the source code could show a fuller picture, but I'd say this is an example of good reporting and not speculation.
Having read the article, it is clear that it is not baseless speculation.
Two benchmarks running the same code, but with a different name. One runs faster than the other. The one that runs faster has it's name hardcoded in the samsung binaries.
You are right that the source code could show a fuller picture, but I'd say this is an example of good reporting and not speculation.