Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's odd, and to reassure you I would say that I personally would rather see somebody with a physical camera. That way I know I can avoid the area they're photographing if I don't want to be shot or just be aware I'm going to be in a photo otherwise. It also makes me (rightly or wrongly) think the photo will be uploaded somewhere a bit higher than an Instagram / Facebook feed (my wife used to put DSLR photos on Instagram and for an image feed website I used to be shocked at how poorly images were downscaled, maybe that's changed).

I find something much more pervasive about any upright smartphone being a camera at any given time, whether the person is being obvious about it or not. A dedicated camera is actually more reassuring to me, as its use-cases are probably more innocent than a smartphone camera.

Smartphone cameras have given poor photography to the masses. I reckon I'm probably in thousands of peoples photos that were taken on a whim with a phone. And I've witnessed situations where it appears people are trying to stealthily take photos of people with phones on public transport and the like.



Instagram isn't for sharing photos, it's for sharing a curated, artificial view into your life. Photos are just the medium, it's not meant for art.


> That way I know I can avoid the area they're photographing

Not with 360 cameras! Which are super fun btw.


> for an image feed website I used to be shocked at how poorly images were downscaled, maybe that's changed

It has not, still garbage.


Which can be a blessing in disguise. It makes it less attractive to steal images for commercial purposes.


I figured as much. Oh well, not like it's primary function is an image sharing site :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: