Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Some of their early well known content was where to get coke in Brooklyn and how to sleep with a stripper. And in 2006, that was edgy ny hipster content. That was their brand from the absolute beginning. They just happened to also do some good video journalism along the way.


And youtube started as a dating app while only fans was meant to be sfw.

What something starts as and what it succeeds at are two very different things.


Except Vice did start and end that way.

So you just made up a story of fictional version of Vice being taken over by trust fund Millenials (whatever that means) and you didn't realize that the content you hate was present in Vice from start to finish of its lifecycle (and may have even made its actual journalism possible). And then, when called out on it, you pretended you did know that all along.


Yes and what it was successful as was something else again. The trust fund kiddies went away and actually interesting people took over. Then the trust fund kiddies came back and ran it to the ground. Same thing as reddit.


And who are these trust fund kiddies that left and came back?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: