Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Doubtful.

People often romanticize the "mom & pop" places, but there's a reason that most consumer-facing companies are very large, and those reasons were enumerated by the OP.

Also, there's a good deal of selection bias going on. If you had a successful business, why wouldn't you look to expand it to multiple locations? Running a single store makes your business vulnerable and usually requires a lot of time.



While there are advantages to having large / homogeneous / monolithic / centralized entities.

There are also weaknesses in the face of some threat because there is no diversity to survive it.


I’m not sure I agree with the diversity argument. That argument is based on the biological principle of natural selection. However, an economy isn’t a biological system: its a man-made system that is designed and run by an intelligence, actually many intelligent agents working together.

Biology is not designed or run by any intelligent agent that we know of. When people apply the diversity argument to non-biological systems, it makes me think they are actually and really arguing for intelligent design of biology.


My argument is a nature centric one, indifferent of biology. Biology is nature through carbon based life forms.

My argument still holds, if you over centralize or lack diversity (not in the social science race or sex based sense) then you’ll run into issues. Examples include Russian central governance, as opposed to more independent localized governance and sustainability. Another is non diverse economic production, for example many middle eastern countries.


Not everyone is driven to become the CEO of a mega-corporation.

Some people are content with what they have, or find running one location stressful enough, or whatever reason.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: