Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I recall watching, some years ago, a documentary about the making of Tetris in which one of the contributors noted how much less colourful public spaces were in the advertising-free Soviet Union compared to the West.

Which isn't to say that a better balance couldn't be struck (in the West and elsewhere) now, but 'cancer' is the sort of thing you want to eradicate rather than moderate.



I would imagine the authoritarian nature of the Soviet Union would suppress other displays of colour also. Much of the colour in my city is street art

https://www.christchurchnz.com/christchurch/arts-and-culture...


So you think the reason the Soviet union was less colourful was because there wasn't ads?

You realize that advertising isn't what created coloured paints or what allows us to plant flowers right?


> So you think the reason the Soviet union was less colourful was because there wasn't ads?

I think it can have been a contributory but not a determinative factor. Mainly, I was just relaying an interesting observation, about the impact of advertising on public spaces, that I hadn't heard elsewhere, or previously, which prompted me to think that eradicating advertising probably isn't an optimum solution.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: