Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ncr100's commentslogin

Yep - Says he's got a Microsoft.com email address:

> "feel free to reach me directly (my alias @microsoft.com) or"


I read this as 'RAT factories' - like Neanderthal decided to breed thousands of rats presumably for food. Assuming rats were meaty and not taboo then, as they are now.

They’re still meaty and they aren’t taboo everywhere!

Whenever I go to the family farm I check to see if there are any fat juicy grilled rats at the local market. Alas, I’m still too squeamish to eat them, but I’m working up to it!


Your comment reminded me of the Great Hanoi Rat Massacre (I won't spoil the punchline):

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/hanoi-rat-massacre-190...


That's amazing, thank you!

I've heard exactly the same story about snakes, but that took place in British India.

Probably that (the one I heard) derived from this one.


Same, and I also read Netherlands instead of Neanderthals.

Yeah me to!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Rat%2C_IJlst

>De Rat (English: The Rat) is a smock mill in IJlst, Friesland, Netherlands, which was originally built in the seventeenth century at Zaanstreek, North Holland. In 1828 it was moved to IJlst, where it worked using wind power until 1920 and then by electric motor until 1950. The mill was bought by the town of IJlst in 1956 and restored in the mid-1960s. Further restoration in the mid-1970s returned the mill to full working order. De Rat is working for trade and is used as a training mill. The mill is listed as a Rijksmonument (No. 39880).[1]


I keep reading Neanderthal rat factories too! HP Lovecraft would be pleased with us.


Yikes - selling "When did I last Orgasm" to Mark Zuckerberg's team seems like an undesirable "leak" of information.

.. To be clear, "wired app to standard ad-tech surveillance plumbing, sending concepts like user logged period and pregnancy mode entered, through its pipes, to improve ad revenues through Meta's targeting platform" .. ad-events .. this is the kind of behavior that happened, in plain-ish speaking terms, per what I read in my non-expert capacity.

Q: (answered) Now I want to know who runs (ran?) Flo - can we find their Board of Directors & C-level people on LinkedIn to profile what kind of industries lead to this kind of (I believe) privacy violating behaviors? It's a biased question on my part, as Correlation is not Causality! Onwards ..

My limited, biased, AI-driven research suggests the violating behavior ran from June 2016 through February 2019, and that generally the Company was designed to be consumer-app with subscriptions and is healthcare-adjacent, targeting an unregulated non-HIPPA market.

- INVESTORS = consumer subscription apps with ad-driven growth loops

- BUSINESS MODEL =

(1) free or freemium consumer apps where

(2) growth depends on paid acquisition through Meta/Google/TikTok ad platforms, which

(3) requires sending conversion events back to those platforms to optimize ad spend, and

(4) the SDKs that do this are designed by ad networks to hoover up everything by default.

- EXECUTIVE =

* No Privacy / Data Protection C-level officers during violating period


Check out this album, especially Bernard's Boogie, and Horses.

- https://donnybenet.bandcamp.com/album/il-basso

Totally not written by Google.


That is too difficult as the concept (of trusting one's perception) is, I believe, intertwined deeply with other aspects of being human, for many people.

It's not reasonable to require that those people be mentally organized in a manner that already mistrusts reality, in a healthy manner.


Yes, and tx for sharing the experience of the hog video - recommended to me too and I chose not to click, as I did not want the frustration of seeing another "tech run amuck" example, of tech disrupting YET ANOTHER norm.

Relatedly, IMO "trust" as a word / concept is deserving of being reevaluated nowadays.

E.g. I don't know that you, NitpickLawyer, are a real person. And when I go through the mental exercise of inventing the details, proofs, and evidence I'd need in order to satisfy my doubt, I never succeed until I reach the physical-contact-with-NitpickLawyer condition.

So I think we need to evaluate what is necessary for oneself to operate in society, separate from these untrustable things .. such as media / news reports, and all the other things I just don't want to worry about, right now. :-(


+++ Has good examples.

I wonder then if the workaround for THAT (losing access to Banking / "Google trust-deriving apps") is to get a second device, wifi-only no-SIM G-Android.

Cumbersome, but any other deterring reasons why "not a good workaround"?


They are shiny. Many aspects feel more 'human', IMO.

If you use ad-blockers, I recommend exploring that use-case with Apple / Safari. It's doable though for me is a bit frustrating.

In fact, I urge creating a list of use-cases before heading out to the store, and cranking through those while at the store. Computers/phones are such a deeply entwined component of modern life it could be a long list.

Passwords, backups, bluetooth compatibility, connecting mass-storage devices to iPad / iPhone, etc.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: