Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bobkb's commentslogin

I had reviewed this application long ago to find tons of issues - not surprised many of it are now CVEs. I am also surprised that the product is still active.

So sad. We have been using this amazing project extensively

You had previously installed this application?

There is already memory palace ?

I wonder what happens to the “Gemini enterprise”. Will it do a Google plus or Google wave ?

Gemini seems more tailored towards information retrieval and product integration (including Android and even iOS via Apple's deal).

Google may reckon they can't (yet) reconcile their vision of Gemini with the raw coding performance of Claude and Codex.


They have recently added Veo and family and pretty much everything under Vertex branding to Gemini enterprise

Resuming sessions after more than 1 hour is a very common workflow that many teams are following. It will be great if this is considered as an expected behaviour and design the UX around it. Perhaps you are not realising the fact that Claude code has replaced the shells people were using (ie now bash is replaced with a Claude code session).

> Resuming sessions after more than 1 hour is a very common workflow that many teams are following

Yeah it's called lunch!


I think thats a bad idea. It seems like expecting to have a prompt open like this, accumulating context puts a load on the back end. Its one of those things that is a bad habit. Like trying to maintain open tabs in a browser as a way to keep your work flow up to date when what you really should be doing is taking notes of your process and working from there.

I have project folders/files and memory stored for each session, when I come back to my projects the context is drawn from the memory files and the status that were saved in my project md files.

Create a better workflow for your self and your teams and do it the right way. Quick expect the prompt to store everything for you.

For the Claude team. If you havent already, I'd recommend you create some best practices for people that don't know any better, otherwise people are going to expect things to be a certain way and its going to cause a lot of friction when people cant do what the expect to be able to do.


> I think thats a bad idea. It seems like expecting to have a prompt open like this, accumulating context puts a load on the back end

Let's see what Boris Cherny himself and other Anthropic vibe-coders say about this:

https://x.com/bcherny/status/2044847849662505288

Opus 4.7 loves doing complex, long-running tasks like deep research, refactoring code, building complex features, iterating until it hits a performance benchmark.

https://x.com/bcherny/status/2007179858435281082

For very long-running tasks, I will either (a) prompt Claude to verify its work with a background agent when it's done... so Claude can cook without being blocked on me.

https://x.com/trq212/status/2033097354560393727

Opus 4.6 is incredibly reliable at long running tasks

https://x.com/trq212/status/2032518424375734646

The long context window means fewer compactions and longer-running sessions. I've found myself starting new sessions much less frequently with 1 million context.

https://x.com/trq212/status/2032245598754324968

I used to be a religious /clear user, but doing much less now, imo 4.6 is quite good across long context windows

---

I could go on


Agents making forward progress hours apart is an expected pattern and inference engines are being adapted to serve that purpose well.

It’s hard to do it without killing performance and requires engineering in the DC to have fast access to SSDs etc.

Disclosure: work on ai@msft. Opinions my own.


‘effort high/max’ seems to be working though

The problem I described occurred on Claude Code, Opus 4.7/1M, max effort, patched system prompts with all "don't think for simple stuff" instructions removed as well as CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADAPTIVE_THINKING=1 even though Opus 4.7 ignores it.

> Opus 4.6 DISABLE_ADAPTIVE_THINKING=1

Strangely this option was not working for many of us on a team plan


The design process was completely dictated by Figma. After the demise of Adobe XD, Invison etc they were the only option. Happy to see alternatives entering to save us from the curse of Figma !

Using Claude and Codex side by side now . Would love to just use one eventually

Competition forever, ideally

What's the benefit of using both?

Helps with code reviews, plan reviews etc. I have found it very useful to auditing with multiple providers.

quota resets/backup when the other is unavailable.

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: