> and both companies now have measures to lock their enterprise customers (who tend to sign year-long deals) at those API prices

why would enterprises do that if they can just use bedrock or vertex?

congress made h1b dual-intent in 1990

Tell us more.

perhaps they refer to Claude code being built on top of a React renderer for terminals, Ink https://github.com/vadimdemedes/ink

and is riddled with timeouts and intervals in useffects

"banana big but banana skin is bigger" - supposedly Orwell

Or you could use gcp Vertex or aws Bedrock and still have access to a bunch of FMs without a markup.

it's still somewhat gated behind "trusted access" for cyber, see https://chatgpt.com/cyber

It's not like they don't own API's that those cli's are hitting. They have all the stats they need.

I look at those numbers and think that A18 pro is 25% faster as single thread is what matters for UX.

browserbench speedometer 3.0 on A18 pro - 33, Intel Core i5-1235U - 22

i9-13900KS gets about 33

M4 Pro - 44-50

You can't compare raw CPU speed by measuring different browsers on different OSes :)

Try this:

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/6693vs7115vs7229vs7232/...

That is why I mentioned that the litmus test was to put the mobile processor on a real laptop. Not the synthetic benchmarks.

The laptop is in the hands of customers and they are happy for the performance they get.

You can pick the same browsers i.e. brave or chrome.

Also, let's not forget about unified memory impact. Raw cpu benchmarks are only one side of the complex system.

> Also I think it is telling that they are calling them SpaceX not X. The X brand is absolutely toxic, especially in enterprise.

it might not help all that much once it turns into "grok" harness or otherwise associated with elon

No need to leak. If we don't see a very public flow of various CVE's across the industry then it was a nothing-burger.