Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Retz4o4's commentslogin

Most of these comments are spot on. We seeded (and continued to fund) the most recently approved Alzheimer's drug on the market about 15 years ago and fought an uphill battle the entire way. The entire industry - other than what seems about a dozen neuroscientists - were fully bought into the plaque scam, and many still are. As I mentioned in a different thread some time ago, the best way to think about plaque is like gravestones in a cemetery. If you remove the gravestones, the dead bodies are still there.

We were introduced to the head of neuroscience at Houston Methodist as part of our due diligence process; his entire career was built upon the removal of plaque from the brain and would not even consider an alternative theory. We ran into this for years. It made funding the trials very difficult. We were totally ignored by all the Alzheimer's charities and orgs (ie Seth Rogan's for example). Only the Michael J. Fox foundation contributed early on.

However, our drug, now known as Zunveyl, was a pro-drug of already on the market Galanatmine, which was the second most commonly prescribed drug in the world for this disease (about $6BN/yr). Our pro-drug almost eliminated the side effects of Galanamine (nausea, vomiting) and enabled us to increase dosage high enough to actually get enough molecules into the brain. It was (is) awesome. Some of our first clinical trials were healthy young adults - they did extremely well. I don't think I can share the actual results but I hope that we (or someone) can fund a study to get approval for "regular people" usage one day given how well this test went. Later tests went just a well but only thanks to the "fast track" program were we able to even get to market.

Even today after being on the market for about a year now, the market uptake is slow due to insurance company approvals. We are getting reorders like crazy but often new patients get denied initially and then doctors have to appeal and then they get approved. This has been taking about 6 months on average and is brutal for people with the disease (and their families). Since getting a drug to patients is actually a (sadly and surprisingly) large sales and marketing expense, the company (Alpha Cognition) is focusing on long-term-care centers for now, but we had always hoped that this would be available much more broadly and much faster. Several of the early investor's parents were alive and afflicted with this disease when we started, but have since passed away. I hope that we can get this out and help others - faster.

The mother company that spun this out is also working on other molecules to try to stop Alzheimer's itself, rather than "only" help with symptoms but as always funding is a challenge. Clinical trials must be done correctly and are thus expensive.

Been living this battle for 15+ years and hoped that this can shed a little light on how things have been.


Correct they don’t. It’s like removing the gravestones from the graveyard.


Zunveyl


They own Trello.



So on to Linux and RasberryPis?


Not the same (less safe)


This is incorrent, we've been selling low-cost Far-UVC for quite a bit longer than Aerolamp (they use some of our technology), and it is is proven to be as safe by third-party testing.


Sorry I will correct my post. I agree with you. Far UVC super safe


The spectra are slightly different, but Nukit is also filtered, I would expect it to be just as safe--just lower output


To correct. Far UVC is super safe ;)



Retz, I was replying to the same post you were. You were not the problem.


This is not UVC - this is Far UVC and is blocked by the outer layer of your eyeball, so it is safe. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087841/


Not the same wavelength as UV. This wavelength is blocked by your skin - and outer layer of your eyeballs!


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: